State v. Mcneely

8 P.3d 212 (2000)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

The victim disappeared in March 1993. In May 1993, her body was discovered in a dumpster. While D was in jail, another inmate introduced D to Thompson. Thompson spoke with D several times over a three- or four-day period. D discussed the facts of this case. D contacted the police and disclosed incriminating statements that d had made to him about the victim's death. D objected to Thompson's testimony. in part because Thompson was unable to identify D at trial as the man with whom he had spoken in jail. The court allowed Thompson to testify. D argued in part that the testimony was irrelevant and P argued that the testimony was conditionally relevant. The evidence during argument showed that D had met Thompson in jail several years ago and that D had changed his appearance by shaving off his mustache and gaining 25 pounds. The trial court allowed the evidence because it was a matter for the jury to determine the credibility of the evidence and a reasonable jury could so find that Thompson was telling the truth. D was convicted and sentenced to death. D appealed seeking reversal of his conviction or in the alternative that the court vacates his death sentence.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.