This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

V was out with friends, returned to her dorm room and fell asleep. V dreamed she was engaging in sexual intercourse and awoke to find D on top of her having vaginal intercourse. V tried to sit up, but D pushed her back down. V offered no further resistance. D then engaged in anal intercourse with V. V went to the door and turned on the light and D told her not to call the police as he was V's roommate's friend and that he thought that V was the roommate and that he would not have done it if he knew that it was V. V finally made a statement two days later but told several friends immediately. D testified that V told him not to worry as it could have happened to anybody. The State tried D under an indictment of forcible rape. D was convicted of raping a person that was physically helpless to resist. The Court of Appeals reasoned that this fatal variance between the indictment and the conviction for a crime not charged demanded that the judgment be vacated. The State appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.