This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

State (P) presented overwhelming evidence that Quick (D) intended to engage in the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor. P did not prove any overt act in furtherance of D's intent. D's motion for a directed verdict of acquittal was denied. D was convicted and appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.