S.v. v. R.v.

933 S.W.2d 1 (1996)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P, daughter, intervened in her parents' divorce proceeding, alleging that D, father, was negligent by sexually abusing her until she was seventeen years old. P claims she repressed the memories until her parents filed for divorce. D argues that because P filed 2 years and 4 months after her 18th birthday, that the suit was barred by the two-year statute of limitations. P argues that the discovery rule applies which tolled the statute of limitations because P did not consciously recall the abused until 4 months after her 20th birthday. The court held for D in that the discovery rule did not apply to toll the statute of limitations for personal injury actions. P appealed. The court of appeals reversed and D appealed. The Supreme Court of Texas granted certiorari.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.