Swartz v. War Memorial Commission Of Rochester
25 A.D.2d 90 (N.Y. 1966)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Swartz (P) made a deal to be the exclusive concessionaire for food and refreshments at the Rochester War Memorial Building with the War Memorial Commission (D). A clause in the contract prohibited the sale of liquor, but if that clause was stricken, those exclusive rights would go to P (P was obligated to get all the required licenses). D lifted its prohibition on beer, and P refused to obtain a license for its sale. D notified P that if he did not make the application to get the license, the contract would be canceled. P brought an action for declaratory relief. P appealed the dismissal of his action.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner