This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Tarnowski (P) engaged Resop (D) as his agent to investigate and negotiate for the purchase of a route of coin-operated music machines. On 6/2/1947, relying on D's advice and investigation, P purchased such a business. D alleged that there were 75 locations in the operation with one or more machines at each location, that the equipment was not more than 6 months old and that the gross income from all locations was more than $3,000 per month. P was to pay $30,620. He paid $11,000 down. In 6 weeks from purchase, P discovered that D's representations were false. There were no more than 47 locations, and some of them had no machines. Those that did had machines older than 6 months. Moreover, gross income was much lower than described. Upon discovery, P rescinded the sale. He offered to return what he received, but seller refused to give him the money back. P brought a suit which resulted in a verdict of $10,000 for the P. The seller paid $9,500, and the action was dismissed. In this action, P alleges that D, who acting as his agent received a secret commission, which P wants to recover. He also seeks to recover: (1) losses suffered in operating the route; (2) loss of time devoted; (3) expenses for rescission and investigation; (4) nontaxable expenses in connection with prosecution of the suit against the seller; and (5) attorney's fees. P recovered a verdict of $5200, and this is an appeal.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.