This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P believed that the FCC has unreasonably delayed determining whether American Telephone and Telegraph Company ('AT&T') must reimburse ratepayers for two separate instances of allegedly unlawful overcharges. P had petitioned the FCC to investigate and to require AT&T to reimburse customers. The FCC issued a Notice of Inquiry seeking public comment and for the next five years sat and did nothing. Congressional prodding produced two promises to act, but nothing happened. P finally petitioned the court for mandamus.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.