This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Thomas Betts Corporation (P) is a publicly traded company engaged in the electronics business. Leviton (D) is a closely held Delaware corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing electronic components and residential wiring devices. P was interested in buying D for a number of years. No agreement was ever reached. P then decided to seek a minority position in D to force a sale of the company. P negotiated with D's former vice president, Lumburg, and Lumburg's his wife, who was Harold Leviton's niece and owner of 29.1% of the stock. Harold owned 76.45%. P paid $50 million for the 29.1%, all negotiations were conducted in secret, and P was provided with confidential internal information regarding D's internal strategies and accounting figures. P also promised another $20 million in compensation if P acquired all of D. D was informed of the transaction, and Lumburg was immediately fired, rehired, and then fired again. D embarked upon a campaign to buy P. P served D with a formal demand seeking inspection of corporate documents. A few days later P offered to buy Harold's shares for $250 million. D refused the buyout offer and refused inspection of any corporate records. P sued D in Chancery to compel inspection pursuant to the state codes. The court ruled that P's motives were to gain leverage in a buyout but that P could inspect so that it could value the shares that it had acquired. P appealed based on the lower courts improper burden of proof; to adduce evidence from which a credible possibility of mismanagement and waste may be inferred and to adduce specific evidence of waste and mismanagement.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.