Toys 'R' Us, Inc. v. Feinberg

26 F. Supp. 2d 639 (1998)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P has been making use of the Toys 'R' Us mark for over 35 years. The mark is prominently featured in national and regional advertising, and throughout P stores. P has also worked diligently to maintain its reputation as a family-oriented store with a wholesome image. D is the sole proprietor of co-defendant We Are Guns, a firearms store. D's business had been previously known as 'Guns Are Us.' The business's name was changed to 'Guns are We' and then to 'We Are Guns' in response to objections by P. P maintains a website. P sued D seeking damages and an injunction prohibiting D from operating the website at gunsareus.com and from reverting to either of the trade names 'Guns are Us' or 'Guns Are We.'

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.