Tresemer v. Barke

86 Cal.App.3d 656 (1978)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

The action was filed on April 12, 1976, for damages allegedly sustained by P from a Dalkon Shield intrauterine device. D, who inserted the device in August 1972, was charged with willful misconduct (count one) and medical malpractice (count two). Mario De Lara, M.D., who attempted to remove the device on April 17, 1975, was charged with willful misconduct (count three) and medical negligence (count four), and A. H. Robbins Company was charged with the manufacture and distribution of harmful contraceptive intrauterine devices (count five). Eventually, D responded with a demurrer and a motion to strike along with a motion for summary judgment. P filed no opposition to D's motion for summary judgment and made no formal request that the trial court take judicial notice of any document, declaration, or affidavit. D’s motion was granted and P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.