Truck Insurance Exchange v. Michling

364 S.W.2D 172 (1963)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

The only evidence regarding decedent's injury was his widow's (P) testimony. She stated that when the decedent came home from work, he got out of his car stumbling, batting his eyes and looking pale. She said that he told her that he had hit his head on the iron bar across the seat of the bulldozer he was driving. Her husband died about a month later. The testimony was admitted under the 'spontaneous exclamation' exception to the hearsay rule. P got the verdict and D appealed; the statements were hearsay and did not come within the res gestae rule (excited utterances rule) because they did not independently describe the event or occurrence that gave rise to the death of the husband.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.