This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The parties scheduled mediation for December 13, 2001. D sent a letter to P requesting permission to have the claims handler with settlement authority participate in the mediation by telephone. P objected 'vehemently' because he believed the mediation would be a 'waste of time' if D did not send someone to the mediation with settlement authority. P suggested that the Court be contacted immediately so that this issue may be resolved well in advance of the mediation. There was no reply. D came to the mediation and was accompanied by Scott Glow, a representative of D's liability insurance carrier. The company gave Glow authority to pay up to $25,000 to settle all of P's claims. P stated that the mediation was being conducted only to settle P's personal injury claims, but not the potential invasion of privacy claim P has not yet sued upon. Glow was authorized to pay only $20,000 if the settlement would not effect a release of P's invasion of privacy claim. The parties reached an impasse. P's last demand was $32,500, and D's final offer was $20,000. P seeks sanctions for D's failure to send a representative to the mediation who had the authority to settle P's claims.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.