This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Taubensee (D) moved for summary judgment on a breach of written and oral contract action by Tuteur (P) for the failure to accept and pay for coils of steel wire. D placed a purchase order with P for 2000 tons of steel wire rod to be delivered on June 15 and July 20, 1990. P responded by sending three sales contracts dated, June 11, 1990, for 1500 tons of wire shipped from Europe around July-August 1990. Each of the sales contracts required arbitration although the purchase order did not. P shipped 3000 tons of wire to a port in Milwaukee for delivery to D. D accepted and paid for 500 tons of that shipment. Approximately 477 tons of that shipment did not meet D's specifications due to salt-water damage, but P alleges that D improperly refused 2007 tons, the balance. P sued D in Texas, but the district court ruled that there was no personal jurisdiction over D. P then filed a demand for arbitration. D filed an action in District Court to stay those proceedings, as there was no agreement to arbitrate. P's arbitration claim was dismissed under UCC 2-207(a). That decision became final and was never appealed. P now claims that it had a written contract for the delivery of 1,500 tons and an oral contract for the delivery of another 1,500 tons in its present action. D responded that those claims were precluded by issue preclusion and the Statute of Frauds and moved for a summary judgment in its favor.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.