This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

During the course of a grand jury investigation, P subpoenaed a 19-year-old man to testify with regard to potential federal charges against his father. Doe Jr. moved to quash the subpoena claiming that his testimony was shielded by a purported parent-child privilege. The district court granted the motion. P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.