During the course of a grand jury investigation, P subpoenaed a 19-year-old man to testify with regard to potential federal charges against his father. Doe Jr. moved to quash the subpoena claiming that his testimony was shielded by a purported parent-child privilege. The district court granted the motion. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.