This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D gave notice that he planned to raise at trial a defense of entrapment. P then sought to introduce evidence showing D's predisposition to commit the charged offenses. Under Rule 404(b) and Rule 403, the District Court admitted over D's objection certain evidence of D's statements, conduct, and prior convictions for weapons possession as proof of his predisposition to commit the charged offenses. D was convicted and appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.