United States v. Estes,

793 F.2d 465 (2nd Cir. 1986)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Estes (D) worked for Purolater as a driver-guard. One day he decided to invest in his own future and took $55,000 and returned home with the cash. D's wife Lydia was quickly informed of his new-found wealth, and they hid some of the money and spent the rest. D's wife helped hide and launder the money. D and Lydia were then divorced and eventually Lydia contacted the FBI and obtained a grant of immunity for herself and got tapes on D. Lydia testified before the grand jury and at D's trial. D was convicted of perjury and appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.