United States v. Estes,
793 F.2d 465 (2nd Cir. 1986)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Estes (D) worked for Purolater as a driver-guard. One day he decided to invest in his own future and took $55,000 and returned home with the cash. D's wife Lydia was quickly informed of his new-found wealth, and they hid some of the money and spent the rest. D's wife helped hide and launder the money. D and Lydia were then divorced and eventually Lydia contacted the FBI and obtained a grant of immunity for herself and got tapes on D. Lydia testified before the grand jury and at D's trial. D was convicted of perjury and appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner