This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Ortiz (D) was accused of cocaine distribution and conspiracy to distribute. During the trial, the issue of D's prior conviction from two separate heroin sales for impeachment was brought before the trial court. The trial court ruled that the 1972 offenses committed just 4 years ago were admissible for purposes of impeachment. D claims Rule 609 (a) caused him to forego taking the stand and testifying on his own behalf. D was convicted and appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.