This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P moved in limine to exclude large swaths of evidence and testimony at trial related to medical necessity with respect to medical marijuana. This part of the ruling addresses Ds’ issues related to their alleged erroneous belief that their conduct was lawful.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.