This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

A witness saw D putting on a long blonde wig while sitting in a van with the motor running, parked in a Shopping Center. The van was parked approximately 200 feet away from the Security Pacific Bank. The witness notified the police, who arrived in a marked patrol car. Upon arrival of the police, D put the van in reverse and drove off. The police caught up with D, who had fled to a nearby camper/trailer. He was arrested for possession of stolen property. D volunteered the following statements: 'You did a good job. You caught me five minutes before I was going to rob a bank. That's what I was putting the wig on for.' 'The van is stolen. How much do you get for auto theft around here?' D told the police that he was planning to rob a bank when the marked police vehicle came up to the van he was in. He planned to drive up to the drive-in window of the bank and place a phony bomb, along with a demand note, on the window. D described the bank as a large, two-story building, made of brown or reddish brick. D stated that Security Pacific sounded like the name of the bank he intended to rob. Of the thirty-nine banks within five miles of the Shopping Center, only Security Pacific fits D's description of the bank he was planning to rob. Inside the van, the police found a hoax bomb which looked like a real bomb, a red pouch with a demand note taped to it, a long blonde wig, a police scanner programmed to the Roseville Police Department, and a notebook containing drafts of demand notes and the radio frequency of the Rocklin Police Department. D was convicted and appealed. D contends that P failed to establish every element of attempted bank robbery beyond a reasonable doubt.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.