United States v. Torralba-Mendia

784 F.3d 652 (9th Cir. 2015)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

ICE agents investigated a human smuggling operation where the organization would meet migrants on the Mexican side of the border. Escorts would guide the migrants through the ravines and creek-beds. Once inside the United States, a van or sedan would meet the migrants in the desert and drive them to Geuro Shuttle (GS), a company operating out of Tucson. From there, shuttles would drive the migrants to safe houses where they were confined until family members paid for their release. Agents observed D at GS between twenty and twenty-five times. Intercepted phone calls showed that D coordinated the pick-up of migrants and organize their drive north. From his activities and conduct, D was aware at all times to determine if he was being tailed by police. At trial, P introduced I-213 immigration forms, which were labeled a 'Record of Deportable/Inadmissible Alien.' P introduced the forms to show that many of the passengers detained during the investigation were deported. D objected arguing that the forms contained inadmissible hearsay and their introduction violated the Confrontation Clause. They were admitted and D was convicted and appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.