This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Plainclothes police officers bought a total of four bags of 'crack' at $20 a bag in plain daylight from D. The police waited six months and then with court authorization placed a wiretap on D's telephone line. The tap intercepted a conversation between Dt and an unidentified woman in which D bragged about being a drug dealer. In the recorded conversation, D did not admit to making the sales which had occurred six months earlier but admitted committing other drug crimes. D was arrested and charged. At trial, the prosecution sought to introduce the recorded conversation. D objected. The court allowed the evidence but only on the issue of identity and intent and not on the propensity to commit drug-related crimes. D was convicted and appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.