Van Camp v. Mcafoos

156 N.W.2d 878 (1968)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Van Camp (P) sued McAfoos (D) a three-year-old for running his tricycle into P's Achilles' tendon and injuring it. This occurred while P was walking on a public sidewalk. The injury needed surgery to fix. D moved to have the complaint dismissed, as it did not state an action in either negligence or intentional tort. That motion was granted, and P appealed. P states her petition contains the following ultimate facts (1) she was rightfully using the public sidewalk (and thus had a right to the reasonably free use thereof and to remain uninjured during such use), (2) D used his tricycle on the public sidewalk (and thus had a duty to use the same without injurious interference with others), (3) surprise intrusion of the tricycle into the right rear ankle of P (thus interfering with P's right and stating D activated the mechanism causing the injury) and (4) damage resulted from the intrusion. P stands firmly on the proposition that invasion of her person is in itself a wrong and she need plead no more.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.