This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

H and W were married in 1989. H and W made a deal that W did not need to have children. As such, they were married under those terms. H then refused to engage in any type of sexual intercourse with W with contraception. This suit was for an annulment of the marriage in that H committed fraud to an essential element of a marriage contract; he possessed a preconceived, uncommunicated determination at the time of the marriage to have children in the face of an express agreement with W not to have children.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.