Wagner v. State

122 P.3d 599 (2005)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P was standing in a customer service line at K-Mart when she was suddenly and inexplicably attacked from behind. Sam Giese, a mentally disabled patient of the Utah State Development Center (D), 'became violent, took P by the head and hair, threw her to the ground, and otherwise acted in such a way as to cause serious bodily injury to her. D employees had accompanied Mr. Giese to K-Mart as part of his treatment program and had remained in K-Mart to supervise him. While sudden, this was not altogether unpredictable. Mr. Giese had a history of violent conduct and presented a potential danger to the public if not properly supervised. P filed a complaint against D for failing to 'properly supervise the activity of' Mr. Giese while he was in its care. D moved to dismiss in that P's injuries arose out of a battery, a tort for which the government is immune from suit. The district court dismissed the complaint, holding that because Giese initiated contact with 'deliberate' intent, his attack constituted a battery and the government was immune under the statute. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.