Wagner v. State

122 P.3d 599 (2005)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P was standing in a customer service line at K-Mart when she was suddenly and inexplicably attacked from behind. Sam Giese, a mentally disabled patient of the Utah State Development Center (D), 'became violent, took P by the head and hair, threw her to the ground, and otherwise acted in such a way as to cause serious bodily injury to her. D employees had accompanied Mr. Giese to K-Mart as part of his treatment program and had remained in K-Mart to supervise him. While sudden, this was not altogether unpredictable. Mr. Giese had a history of violent conduct and presented a potential danger to the public if not properly supervised. P filed a complaint against D for failing to 'properly supervise the activity of' Mr. Giese while he was in its care. D moved to dismiss in that P's injuries arose out of a battery, a tort for which the government is immune from suit. The district court dismissed the complaint, holding that because Giese initiated contact with 'deliberate' intent, his attack constituted a battery and the government was immune under the statute. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.