This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P worked as a security guard for D April 4, 2014, until he was terminated on June 12, 2014. P worked 16 hours per week and earned $12.49 per hour. On October 23, 2015, P, alleging that he suffered from dyslexia and that D wrongfully terminated his employment in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) sued D for discrimination, retaliation, and failure to accommodate in violation of the ADA. P contends that his dyslexia caused him to have difficulty reading and copying his posted work schedule, and that D denied his request for a written copy of the schedule, and that his termination violated the ADA. P sought production of ESI maintained by two custodians, Frank Caballos and Bobby Baker, who were P's supervisors. P limited the dates for any search to only four months and requested the following search terms: Jim OR Wagoner AND dyslexia OR dyslexic OR read OR reading OR slow OR ADA OR disabled OR disability OR security OR schedule OR copy OR copying. D does not have the capability to perform this global search. D obtained an estimate of $21,570 from a third-party vendor with an additional $24,000 estimated to review the documents retrieved. The search would involve seven computers that the two custodians had access to and an exchange server located in Tennessee. D claims the request is not proportional because P only worked for two months as a security guard, and his potential damages are less than the cost to perform the search.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.