Walters v. Hitchcock

237 Kan. 31 (1985)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Walters (P) had a lump on her neck, a number of tests were conducted, and she was advised by her family physician to seek the advice of a surgeon. P was 32 with four minor children. Dr. Hitchcock (D) recommended surgical removal of the diseased areas of her thyroid gland. The operation was a relatively minor one with low risk. The lump was removed and sent to pathology and P was sutured and sent to the recovery room. No malignancy was detected. P's condition rapidly deteriorated. P was in serious distress when D discovered that a one-inch square section of P's esophagus had been removed. P was taken to surgery, it was observed that a significant hole was in her left front esophagus, and it was concluded that repair was not possible. D sewed up her esophagus, and it was permanently closed. Feeding was possible only through a tube inserted in P's stomach. Additional surgeries followed, and P regained vision and a bypass esophagus was made from a portion of her colon. P sued D. The jury gave her $2,000,000 and D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.