This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

An accident occurred, and P was injured. There was no dispute concerning the extent of P’s injuries nor the fact that the injury disabled P from pursuing the wrestling sport. At the time of the accident, P was 24 years old with a life expectancy of 49.9 more years. P had attended the University of Nebraska and had an outstanding record as an intercollegiate wrestler. His record was an impressive 103-4. Expert testimony indicated that P was a prime candidate for the 1972 Olympic team and had the qualifications to win a medal at the games. There was evidence that those who win a medal have a much better chance to secure employment in the coaching or professional wrestling fields. At the time of the accident, P had intended to make the team and was in training. P offered no evidence of his earnings at the time of the trial that were derived from his wrestling skills, but P was employed as a parole officer since he graduated from college in 1971. There was evidence offered and rejected at trial that supports a finding that as a coach he would have received earnings between $16,000 and $20,000 per year. P got the verdict of $76,000 and D appealed. D contends that the court should not have allowed P’s loss of earning capacity to go before the jury.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.