This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

B.A. was a three-year-old child. A daycare worker was suspicious due to comments B.A. had made. He thought B.A.'s parents, the Swans (D), were abusing B.A. A social worker interviewed B.A., who graphically described sexual acts performed upon her by D. Another three-year-old, R.T., her playmate, was also involved. R.T. was interviewed and made similar statements. Medical exams were performed. Evidence of vaginal penetration was present in B.A., but not R.T. D was brought to trial. The court held that the victims were not competent to testify, and admitted their previous statements under a Washington statute. D were convicted. The court of appeals reversed the convictions as to R.T. because no physical evidence was proved. The Washington Supreme Court granted review.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.