Watteau v. Fenwick,

1 Queen's Bench 346 (1892)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Watteau (P) had sold goods on credit to Humble. Humble had done business at a beerhouse called Victoria Hotel. Humble transferred the business to Fenwick (D). After that transfer, the business remained in Humble's name except Humble had no authority to buy any goods for the business except bottled ales and mineral waters. All other goods were to be supplied by Ds. P sued D to recover the price of goods delivered for which it was admitted that P gave credit to Humble only. The trial court allowed the claim for cigars and bovril but not the other articles. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.