Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Beelman River Terminals, Inc.
254 F.3d 706 (8th Cir. 2001)
Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Curtis was qualified as an expert in hydrology, but his testimony exceeded the scope of his expertise. Wheeling (P) appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner