Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Beelman River Terminals, Inc.

254 F.3d 706 (8th Cir. 2001)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Curtis was qualified as an expert in hydrology, but his testimony exceeded the scope of his expertise. Wheeling (P) appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.