White v. Illinois

502 U.S. 346 (1992)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

White (D) sexually assaulted a four-year-old girl. The girl did not appear at trial, but several other people testified as to her statements, including the girl's babysitter, the girl's mother, the police officer, and the nurse and doctor who treated her. D objected to their testimony on hearsay grounds, stating that the 6th Amendment's Confrontation Clause required that cross-examination of the girl. The court allowed the babysitter, mother, and officer to testify because their testimony fell under a hearsay exception for spontaneous declarations. The court allowed the nurse and doctor to testify because their testimony fell under a hearsay exception for statements made in the course of securing medical treatment. D was found guilty, and the Illinois Appellate court affirmed his conviction, rejecting D's Confrontation Clause challenge. The Illinois Supreme Court denied discretionary review, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.