This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P operates a forest products manufacturing business. P grows, harvests, and processes trees into finished products. Approximately 40 percent of P's timber needs are acquired from P's timberland, which comprises 1,253,000 acres of forested land. From 1992-95 its crop of trees was in part damages by wind, ice storms, wildfires, or insect infestations. The damage left part of P's damaged trees standing and part of them fallen. The damage occurred prior to the intended time for harvest. P salvaged and processed what it could. This was in lieu of simply trying to sell the damages trees in place to a third party. P realized income from the damaged trees when it sold the finished products. P used section 1033 for involuntary conversion treatment (deferral of gain). P deferred only that portion of the gain attributable to the difference between its basis and the fair market value of the damaged trees as of the time its salvage of them began; that is, the value P contends would have been recognized if it had sold the damaged trees on the open market instead of further processing and/or milling the damaged trees into finished products. P is not attempting to defer any portion of the gain attributable to the processing, milling, or finishing of products. D determined that P understated income by improperly deferring gain from the sale of the end product of the damaged trees, as follows: 1992 -- $ 647,953; 1993 -- $ 2,276,282; 1994 -- $ 3,592,035; and 1995 -- $ 4,831,462. P petitioned.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.