This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Worcester (P) sold a house to Trussell (D) for $20,100 with the agreement by D that he would abide by historic preservation restrictions and do a complete historic restoration of the home. The exterior portion was to be completed within one year and if D failed to meet that deadline, P, at its option, had the right to complete the exterior restoration at D's cost. D eventually lost his job, and the work on the home proceeded at a slow pace. P sued for rescission in 1986 but agreed to delay, and the trial was eventually held in 1989. P contended that the restoration of the exterior was still not completed. D had done no restoration of the interior but painted a picture that there was slow, meticulous, steady progress that was hampered by a shortage of funds because D was out of work. The judge found the exterior to be 65-75% complete and refused rescission, the only remedy asked for in the complaint.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.