This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D was charged with capital murder of a police officer. D claimed insanity as a defense to the charge. A psychiatrist and a clinical psychologist, called by D, testified that D was suffering from paranoia, and the psychologist additionally concluded D was 'borderline schizophrenic.' A psychiatrist and a psychologist called by P testified that they found no evidence of a major mental illness and that D was legally sane. At trial, D’s counsel wanted to read portions of the book, H. CAPLAND & B. SADDOCK, MODERN SYNOPSIS, A COMPREHENSIVE TEXTBOOK OF PSYCHIATRY (4th ed.). On direct examination of his two experts and cross-examination of P's two experts, D established that each was familiar with the book in question and that it was recognized as authoritative in the field of psychiatry; however, none of the witnesses were then questioned as to the contents of the work. After P rested, D sought to read portions of the book to the jury. The trial court refused. D was convicted and appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.